The Japanese general election in February 2026 resulted in a landslide victory for the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), securing a “supermajority” of over two-thirds of the seats. While some Western media outlets have rushed to label this the birth of a “Japanese Trumpism” or a sharp “rightward shift,” such headlines fundamentally misread the underlying logic of Japanese political culture.
In the American political context, “reform” implies a process of analyzing systemic failures and fundamentally altering mindsets and behaviors to achieve a new outcome. However, to decode the behavior of the Japanese electorate, one must understand that the “renewal” they sought was not a functional transformation, but a psychological purification.
1. The Rhetoric of “Non-Action”
Prime Minister Takaichi’s campaign was notable for its lack of concrete policy roadmaps or rigorous situational analysis. Instead, she masterfully used the vocabulary of “change” to justify “why we don’t have to change.”
- Policy Neutralization: She rejected the individualistic “Capitalism” of her predecessors (Kishida and Ishiba), hinting at a return to state-led economic planning, yet offered no specific prescriptions before the vote.
- Deciphering “Nagatacho-speak”: Regarding consumption tax cuts, she used the phrase “accelerating the consideration” (kentou wo kasoku suru). In the linguistic subtext of Japanese politics (Nagatacho), this is a coded signal meaning: “We will talk about it, but we will never do it.”
- Ambiguity as Strategy: On sensitive issues like Yasukuni Shrine visits, she pledged to “prepare the environment to gain understanding.” This provides her conservative base with the illusion of intent while providing a built-in excuse to maintain the status quo (avoiding visits) when “understanding” is inevitably not reached.
2. Change as a Shinto Ritual: The Logic of “Oharae”
To understand the Japanese political psyche, one should look at their New Year traditions rather than their policy papers. Every year-end, Japanese people perform Oharae (The Great Purification), a Shinto ritual where the “impurities” of the past year are transferred to paper effigies and washed away. The goal is to “reset” the slate to zero.
In the West, “reform” is akin to an OS update—improving functionality and changing how the system operates. In Japan, “reform” is more like “Spring Cleaning”—refreshing the atmosphere so that life can continue exactly as it did before. By electing a new leader like Takaichi, voters achieved a sense of “renewal” (the mood), which paradoxically serves their deep-seated desire to avoid any actual disruption to their daily lives (the reality).
3. The Risks of the “Blank Check”
Unlike the U.S. political landscape, where competing visions clash and adjust through feedback loops, the Japanese electorate has essentially issued a “blank check” to avoid the discomfort of choice.
- Economic Stagnation: The continuation of half-baked monetary policies risks a weak yen and mediocre interest rates, placing a hidden tax on the populace.
- Geopolitical Vulnerability: While deepening reliance on the Japan-U.S. alliance, Tokyo lacks a “Plan B” for the potential volatility of American democracy. In investment terms, this is the equivalent of putting an entire portfolio into a single, volatile stock.
Conclusion
Western analysts must look beyond the “right-wing” label. This election was not about an ideological pivot, but a deeply cultural maneuver: changing the face of leadership specifically to avoid changing the direction of the country. As long as “reform” in Japan is defined by “mood” rather than “action,” its political trajectory will remain an enigma to those looking for Western-style dynamism.
コメントを残す